Tooth 14 extraction 1/10/20

10 Jan 2019 post extraction notes "a large periodical granuloma was removed" - this was an infection in the sinus above the root of tooth 14. Examining the crown, I saw that there was a visible hole on the top, as described in Dr Patel's note ("carious") - but not seen in the notes of any prior dental visit.

head+neck associates

Dr Patel's assessment "Erika is a 51 year old female with carious non restorable tooth 14 involving maxillary sinus"
10 Jan 2019 pre-extraction plan notes by Dr Patel “Erika is a 51 year old female with carious non restorable tooth 14 involving maxillary sinus”
Extraction operation notes "a large periodical granuloma was removed"
10 Jan 2019 post extraction notes “a large periodical granuloma was removed” – this was an infection in the sinus above the root of tooth 14.

Because, using the Aceco FC-6002-MKII bug detector I knew that the crown had been emitting/receiving high frequency signals, and based on the types of pain and sensations I had neon experiencing, I knew it had been used as a target for directed energy weapons, I asked to keep the extracted crowned tooth for evidence. Dr Patel said that there was a law against removing biological substances from doctors and dentists offices. Being as this was evidence of crime, however, I decided that an extraordinary circumstances exception was in order, so when the doctor left the exam room, I took the tooth off the table and brought it home with me.

Examining the crown at home, I saw that there was a visible hole on the top, as described in Dr Patel’s note (“carious”) – but not seen in the notes of any prior dental visit.

One month earlier, I had reported problems associated with this crown and wireless frequencies to FBI. They did not respond.

web page updated 10 August 2022