Seastorm.com

Litigation Strategy & Purpose

The nature of the crimes against Chris, myself, and my daughter are so vast, and have interfered so profoundly with our ability to have any personal relationships, much to cultivate business relationships, that it is essentially overwhelming. Within this landscape, as far as Chris and myself, we were never able to find an attorney that was not hiding profound conflicts of interest, if not overtly sabotaging us behind the scenes. Because of the nature and extent of the criminal conspiracy, most attorneys do not want to speak to us, and those that do, always conceal their conflicts of interest. There has been one occasion where an attorney spoke with me and was helpful, but this was someone advising me on enforcing an out of state subpoena, not someone whom I was able to retain. Judges have been almost as bad, albeit with more severe consequences, as every judge has had a conflict of interest, and no judges admitted this, much less recused themselves, even after motions for recusal were filed.

The Oregon State Bar is supposed to give low cost referrals for attorney consultation, but they also systematically sabotaged me by giving me referrals to highly inappropriate attorneys, or by ignoring referral requests, or by falsely telling me they'd already given me my limit of referrals but refusing to provide support for that allegation without first being paid around $87.73 (a weirdly precise number considering that it was an estimate).

After repeatedly being told that police and FBI would not investigate the crimes from which I am suffering, contacting many plaintiff's attorneys and experiencing constant rejection (with or without gaslighting), and knowning that the courts are supposed to be open to all citizens - I decided to open up my own civil cases in the hope that the civil litigation process would provide a mechanism for discovery —the legal process of obtaining evidence and testimony - that institutions were otherwise refusing to provide.

I was not prepared, however, for how difficult it would be to obtain discovery materials, nor for the courts themselves to show bias against me.

Often you have to try and fail before you can understand what is really holding you back. I should not have been forced to self-litigate, nor to go through the civil process to deal with continuing crimes that were - and continue to - cause me physical distress and disability, and threaten my life.

In addition, other than a brief child custody issue in a California family court 20 years earlier, I had no experience in the court system. I had no friends or family members who went to law school, and so it was a steep learning curve to understand not just the basics of the law, of the civil process, and of legal rhetoric, but the unique tricks that attorneys and even judges play to make a case go the way they intend. Add to this, Multnomah County is a rocket docket and if you can't get discovery done quickly, you will get your case thrown out on summary judgment. This is how attorneys and even non-represented defendants were able to dispatch my lawsuits: delay or refuse to respond to discovery requests.

Defendants and their attorneys also weren't above lying in documents and deposition. But mostly, they avoided responding to discovery requests.

When I was initially kidnapped in California, I was trying to hire a music rights attorney. Since that time, my litigation has focused on stopping the bioelectronic crimes against me, since I can't really function under a constant state of life-endangering assault and battery. I also know that if I can't stop this obvious crime from occurring, I have no chance of prevailing in a music rights issue, assuming I could physically survive the process. So although music rights and intellectual property theft continues to be a serious concern - I need to be physically safe, and no longer under bioelectronic assault. And in fact, judges and attorneys also need to be safe. Right now, no one is safe.

March 2026