Seastorm.com

Forensic Documentation of a Crime

FBI / Federal Tort Claims Act

Meyer v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) et al.

This page documents my failed attempts to seek relief and redress through the federal court system, 2022-2023.

Narrative

After years of deceit, blacklisting, and refusal by friends, family, political leaders, medical professionals and law enforcement to assist or even to tell the truth about what was going on, I decided to try to use civil litigation as a means to achieving justice, or at least getting or solidifying factual information about the criminal conspiracy, and the federal government government's role in the criminal conspiracy.

I had been trying to get legal assistance since late 2013, without success. I had a relationship with a music rights attorney at that time, but even he lied to me and then sent me a letter in which he stated that I was unappreciative, had accused him falsely, had treated him badly, and stating that he never wanted to work with me again. At the time I wrote it off as a CYA strategy from someone who had committed legal malpractice. However, years later it became clear that there was actually a widespread defamation campaign against me, in which I was being portrayed as a severely mentally ill, unstable, non-functional, and potentially dangerous individual. This extended into reports made by police and medical professionals, most of which are deeply deceptive and full of false information.

The idea to file suit against the FBI using the Federal Torts Claim Act came to me after reading news articles about how the USA Olympic gymnastics team had hired attorneys to file a FTCA complaint against the FBI for failing to adequately investigate their complaints about Dr. Larry Nassar. In fact I contacted the offices of one of the attorneys the team had hired, and was told that while they did not work in Oregon, they knew attorneys in Oregon and that if I were to send them an email, they could recommend someone to me. They offered to help refer me to an attorney in Oregon before I had told them my name. After I sent the requested follow up email, they ghosted me - neither answering that email, or a follow up, or responding to phone calls.

This kind of behavior was typical also from Oregon lawyers, or I was politely waived off. Requests for consultations from Oregon State Bar were also sabotaged or blocked in various ways, both by Oregon State Bar representatives and by the attorneys to whom they referred me. This was consistent regardless of which case and which court was involved. Attorneys as a professional class appear to be adverse to assisting me, often not giving reasons, though when they do give reasons, the reasons seem dishonest. This is a judicial system issue that goes beyond attorneys - I saw similar behaviors in various representatives of different agencies (including oversight agencies like the Oregon Board of Dentistry and the Federal Title IX office, in state and federal victims rights agencies), in law professors, in judges, and of course, in the police and FBI. In some cases, I would have a particularly difficult interaction with someone, only for that individual to be immediately promoted to a better professional position.

My public school education in civics, however, told me that I had a right to seek redress through the courts, with or without an attorney, so although I could not find legal assistance (including through the "free legal assistance" services provided through the federal court), since every other effort I'd made toward achieving justice had been thwarted, even though I had no real experience in or around litigation, I decided to bring my own cases. At that time, I had been suffering severe offenses for nearly a decade, and I was aware that statutes of limitations could prevent me from bringing some actions, so I was stuck in this cycle where I was continually being abused, was suffering tremendous physical pain, was suffering suffocating blacklisting, was suffering from systematic defamation including fabrication of medical and police records, was suffering from illegal surveillance and trafficking, was suffering tremendous intellectual property theft going back decades, including Chris' musical catalog which should have been (and in fact, is) worth millions.

I later realized that statutes of limitations are tolled when the crimes are connected to a continuing criminal conspiracy and/or when the opposing side conceals vital information - but I couldn't really know how bad things were without attempting to bring court cases. For example, it was only through litigation attempts that I could see that JUDGES are taking part in his crime.

So I completed the Standard Form 95, putting my complaint into an attachment (pdf), which I filed by fax and mail on September 16, 2022.

Apparently it is very difficult to sue the federal government. I am owed billions, not just in damages, but in royalties from stolen intellectual property which has been distributed globally across multiple industries (the entire entertainment industry, as well as gaming, publishing, and medical and scientific research to name a few) and used to generate billions in revenue.

In addition to it being difficult to sue the government, federal laws seem to be written with the implicit assumption that the federal government would NEVER be involved in a criminal conspiracy, much less a major, government-wide criminal conspiracy, much less LEADING, such a criminal conspiracy, even criminally coercing citizens to participate in and cover up such a conspiracy. This is no big surprise, considering that participation in this crime appears to be a prerequisite to being elected to the legislature, and they are the ones writing the laws.

None of this changes how unconstitutional, heinous, and damaging this criminal enterprise is, however.

I will admit the FTCA was not designed to deal with this criminal conspiracy. Rather, the FTCA and civil litigation in general is aimed toward dealing with damages that occurred in the past, and which can be relatively simply described (the floor was wet, and I slipped). I, on the other hand, was forced to deal with a continuing avalanche of crime, which included a near constant state of abuse, retaliation, obstruction of justice, and evidence spoliation.

After you file the SF95, you are supposed to wait six months for a response. Should the matter not be resolved in those six months, you have the option to sue for damages.

However, after filing the SF95, I continued to experience horrible, painful, debilitating, and terrifying physical retaliations in the form of bioelectronic attack to my organ systems. In addition, my cat was being injured every day from the same bioelectronic weaponry. And, not knowing how complicit the courts themselves were, I was concerned that the FBI would feel threatened enough by impending litigation to end my life.

For this reason, I attempted to file for injunctive relief. I wanted a hearing where I could show evidence that this specific type of biomedical damage is occurring, in order that a federal judge could tell the FBI to stop harming me, my pets, my family members, and everyone else as well.

Because this was my first foray into the court system, I really knew nothing about civil procedure, or even about how to LEARN about civil procedure. Even the language of the courts was confusing to me. I didn't know what a "complaint" was. I didn't know what a "motion" was. I did know what an injunction is, mainly because I needed one. However, I didn't have any idea how the federal courts work. I didn't understand how different federal courts were from family court, and I had average knowledge of how injunctive relief works in the family court system.

In family court, if someone is harming you, you can request a hearing to show cause for a restraining order in which a judge orders the party harming you to stop. This is what I wanted.

In federal court, apparently, you cannot get injunctive relief without first filing a formal complaint - in other words, opening a civil case. I knew that I couldn't file a case against the FBI until six months had passed from my SF95 submission.

So, when I went to the court to request injunctive relief, they clerk handed me the same forms he handed everyone - a complaint form. This is where my federal case against the FBI first went off the rails. The form, and the process, I needed doesn't exist - at least not without significant workarounds. I truly needed (and still need, as the damages are continuing) an expert attorney.

The next problem had to do with the judge.

This crime has its own coded language. The code is layered into the subtext of songs, television shows, films, video games, books, news articles - and even court filings, including those made by attorneys and judges.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is televised. In watching these hearings, and seeing how the appellate court judges use sign language, I know they are all complicit in this crime. However, I had to at least believe, at some level, that these judges took their oaths, and the jobs they do under oath, seriously.

Apparently, it was a false belief.

I doubt there would have been a single judge that would have worked out for me, but the judge to which they assigned my Injunction Request, Michael H Simon, was particularly bad for me. First, he is the son of television writer Danny Simon, and nephew of the famous screenwriter Neil Simon. In other words, his family has been involved in exploiting my family going back at least two generations. I suspected this could be a problem at the time, but I didn't understand the crime well enough to know how bad it was. In addition, there are reasons to suspect that Judge Simon's father and uncle were actually bioelectronically murdered, since they died from diseases typically found in bioelectronic murders - kidney disease, pneumonia, dementia, heart failure, strokes. This is what I mean by coercion.

In addition, Judge Simon is married to Congresswoman Susan Bonamici. In late 2022 I was not really aware how complicit our representatives and senators are in this crime. I had to write several more letters to several more representatives who would ignore all the crimes and all the evidence before I truly understood. Based on what I've seen, I believe that funding for federal projects favored by various Senators and Representatives is contingent on them participating in these crimes, Bonamici included.

I should have asked the judge to recuse himself, but at this time I kept believing that they would take their oaths of office seriously, and that they would not rule on a case in which they held a conflict of interest.

Judge Michael H Simon was not only comfortable ruling on this case - he dismissed the case sua sponte, giving me leave to amend. However - even by the end of this process, I still didn't really understand the difference between a complaint and a motion. I didn't understand that I had actually filed a complaint. So when I went back the following September to file my real complaint, this time selling musical equipment in order to make the court fees in hopes of avoiding another sua sponte dismissal, the same judge was assigned to my case, and dismissed it based on claim preclusion and issue preclusion. That is when I learned that I had initially not simply asked for an injunction and TRO, but unknowingly filed a civil complaint.

I appealed the second decision, and in the appeal, explained in detail why Judge Michael H Simon should have recused himself. The appeal was denied.

This week it will have been three years since my FTCA case, filed September 11, 2023, was dismissed. The crimes continue. I continue to suffer tremendously, and in 2025, my father was bioelectronically murdered by the FBI.

September 8, 2026

Case Documents

Dockets
2022 Injunctive relief/TRO request - 322-cv-01779-SI
FTCA complaint against FBI (RICO, civil rights violations, Sherman act violations)
Motion to Vacate 3:22-cv-01779-SI dismissal, Appeal of 3:23-cv-01320-SI dismissal, request for recusal of Judge Michael H Simon due to multiple conflicts of interest
Downtown Portland Oregon near Mark O Hatfiled Courthouse, Dec 30, 2022 - after dark
December 30, 2022
Portland, Oregon downtown